VALIDITY OF SUPPLEMENTARY TEACHING MATERIALS ON BUFFER SOLUTION TO TRAIN ARGUMENTATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32699/23e0t159Keywords:
Validity, Supplementary teaching materials, Argumentation skills, Buffer solutionAbstract
Supplementary teaching materials are tools used as an addition to learning. Good teaching materials must pass through a feasibility assessment, such as validity. Validity is important to review the quality and content of teaching materials, by measuring the suitability between aspects of teaching materials. The research purpose is to determine the validity of supplementary teaching materials on buffer solutions that can train argumentation skills. This research is a type of development research that focuses on developing products for learning using the ADDIE model that is limited to the development stage. The instrument used in this research is a validation sheet consisting of content and construct validity. The target of the research is supplementary teaching materials in practicing argumentation skills on buffer solutions. The teaching materials were assessed by 3 validators, that is, experts in chemistry learning. The assessment results from the validation sheet are content validity has a mode of 4 and construct validity has a mode of 4 is declared valid. From this assessment can conclude that the supplementary teaching material on buffer solutions material is valid in supporting argumentation skills training. Based on the results, it is expected to contribute to producing additional teaching materials that are feasible to help train the argumentation skills of students. In addition, the results of this study are also expected to help readers, especially educators, to gain knowledge and references to teaching materials that can be used in training argumentation skills.
References
Akili, A. W. R., Lukum, A., & Laliyo, L. A. R. (2022). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Larutan Elektrolit Berbasis Model Argument-Driven Inquiry untuk Melatih Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMA. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 16(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v16i1.28996
Anam, K., Bintari, S. H., & Parmin, P. (2023). Development of Teaching Material Supplements Based on Socio Scientific Issues to Improve Students’ Scientific Argumentation Ability. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 12(37), 32–39.
Arif, M. H., & Rukmi, A. S. (2020). Pengembangan Buku Suplemen untuk Keterampilan Menulis Deskripsi Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. JPGSD, 8(5), 1033–1043.
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. USA: University of Georgia.
Budiyono, A., Wildani, A., & Mahardika, I. K. (2020). Analisis Korelasi Kemampuan Memahami dengan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa melalui Model Pembelajaran Argument Based Science Inquiry. Phenomenon : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 10(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.21580/phen.2020.10.1.4539
Demircioglu, T., Karakus, M., & Ucar, S. (2023). Developing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills and Argumentation Abilities Through Augmented Reality–Based Argumentation Activities in Science Classes. Science and Education, 32(4), 1165-1195. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00369-5
Devi, N. D. C., Susanti V.H. E., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2018). Analysis of High School Students’ Argumentation Ability in The Topic of Buffer Solution. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia), 3(3), 141. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkpk.v3i3.23308
Hardini, S. D., & Alberida, H. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Argumentasi Peserta Didik. Biodidaktika: Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 17(1), 93–99.
Hikmah, S. I., Tukiran, T., & Nasrudin, H. (2023). Validity of Student Worksheets Based on Model Argument Driven Inquiry Integrated by STEM to Train Students’ Argumentation Ability and Self-Efficacy in Chemical Equilibrium Material. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(4), 416–433. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i4.300
Khoiroh, N. S., & Azizah, U. (2021). Validation of Thermochemistry Supplement Book Based Problem Solving to Train Students Metacognitive Skills. JCER (Journal of Chemistry Education Research), 5(2), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.26740/jcer.v5n2.p41-51
Mashudi. (2021). Pembelajaran Modern: Membekali Peserta Didik Keterampilan Abad Ke-21. Al-Mudarris : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 93–114.
Nurofik, A., Yuliana, Yanuardi, S., & Adabiah, A. (2022). Validitas Buku Pengantar Teknologi Informasi di Area SMK PPN Padang. Jurnal Ilmiah Hospitality, 11(2), 835–842.
Nuryasana, E., & Desiningrum, N. (2020). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Strategi Belajar Mengajar untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 1(5), 967–974. https://doi.org/10.47492/jip.v1i5.177
Prastiwi, D., Setyosari, P., & Husna, A. (2020). Pengembangan Multimedia Tutorial sebagai Suplemen pada Mata Pelajaran Kimia Materi Asam dan Basa Kelas XI. JINOTEP (Jurnal Inovasi dan Teknologi Pembelajaran): Kajian dan Riset dalam Teknologi Pembelajaran, 6(2), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.17977/um031v6i22020p069
Rahmansyah, M. A., Muslim, & Sinaga, P. (2022). Studi Kelayakan Bahan Ajar Interaktif Multipresentasi Berbantuan Articulate Storyline 3. Spektra: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Sains, 8(2), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.32699/spektra.v8i2.241
Risyanti, E., Lisdiana, L., & Isnaeni, W. (2022). Implementation of Supplement Teaching Materials Based on Problem Based Learning to Improve Concept Mastery and Health Care Attitudes. Journal of Primary Education, 11(2), 218–230.
Roviati, E., & Widodo, A. (2019). Kontribusi Argumentasi Ilmiah dalam Pengembangan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis. Titian Ilmu: Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Sciences, 11(2), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.30599/jti.v11i2.454
Sariati, Kadek, N., Suardana, Nyoman, I., Wiratini, & Made, N. (2020). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Kimia Siswa Kelas XI pada Materi Larutan Penyangga. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran P-ISSN : 1858-4543 e-ISSN : 2615-6091, 4(1), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v4i1.15469.
Setiawan, A. M., & Sholiha, F. Y. (2022). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa Interaktif Berbantuan Aplikasi Liveworksheet pada Materi Pesawat Sederhana untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa SMPN 23 Malang. Spektra: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Sains, 8(2), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.32699/spektra.v8vi2.266
Suartha, I., Setiawan, I., & Sudiatmika, A. (2020). Pola Argumen Toulmin pada Proses Pembelajaran IPA SMP. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 1–11.
Sugiono, Noerdjanah, & Wahyu, A. (2020). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Alat Ukur SG Posture Evaluation. Jurnal Keterapian Fisik, 5(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.37341/jkf.v5i1.167
Tanfiziyah, R., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2021). Profil Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa mengenai Isu Sosiosaintifik dalam Pembelajaran Online. BIOSFER : Jurnal Biologi dan Pendidikan Biologi, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.23969/biosfer.v6i1.4081
Ula, F. R., & Suyono. (2023). Development of Argumentation Skills Assessment Instruments on Buffer Solution Material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 10792–10799. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.4760
Widiastiningsih, R., Asrial, A., & Effendi-Hasibuan, M. H. (2022). Pengembangan E-Modul berbasis Pola Argumentasi Toulmin untuk Meningkatkan Argumentasi Siswa pada Materi Asam Basa. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 410–414. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.2.410-414
Witri, E., Ngatijo, N., & Haris Effendi-Hasibuan, M. (2020). Development of Electronic Student Worksheets Based on Toulmin Argumentation Patterns to Improve Argumentation Skills in Basic Acid Materials. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 12(3), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v12i3.21160
Wulansari, W., Nurmilawati, M., Utami, B., & Christiono, E. B. (2020). Analisis Validasi Keterampilan Komunikasi dan Argumentasi Siswa Biologi SMA Kelas XI MIPA. Efektor, 7(1), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.29407/e.v7i1.14340
Yati, W., & Amini, R. (2020). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar dengan Pendekatan Cooperative Learning Tipe Turnamen di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(1), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i1.335
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
