Sosialisasi Integrasi Teknologi dalam Pembelajaran Sains Menggunakan Physics Education Technology (PhET)
Community-based Research, Keseimbangan, Pemahaman Konsep, Persepsi, PhET, Balancing Act, Conceptual Understanding, Perception
Abstract
The community engagement activity was conducted using the community-based research method. The engagement began with the formation of a community and continued with socialization activities and the application of technology integration in science education. Finally, an evaluation was conducted in the form of concept comprehension tests and student perception surveys. The activities were implemented according to plan and achieved the desired goals. Firstly, students' conceptual understanding surpassed the minimum criteria (70.36). However, difficulties were still encountered by students related to concept comprehension. These difficulties need to be further investigated. Secondly, students' perception of the activities was considered excellent (84.00). They acknowledged that integrating technology using PhET could create engaging learning experiences, enhance motivation to learn, assist in understanding concepts, and encourage them to actively engage in learning. However, they still doubted whether PhET could be as beneficial as they perceived it to be in other science topics. Thus, learning activities with PhET integration are deemed suitable and evaluated for their usefulness in other science topics.
Downloads
References
Finkelstein, N. D., Adams, W. K., Keller, C. J., Kohl, P. B., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., Reid, S., & Lemaster, R. (2005). When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.1.010103
OECD. (2018). The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030. In OECD Education Working Papers. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
Perkins, K., Moore, E., Podolefsky, N., Lancaster, K., & Denison, C. (2012). Towards research-based strategies for using PhET simulations in middle school physical science classes. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1413, 295–298. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3680053
Podolefsky, N. S., Adams, W. K., Lancaster, K., & Perkins, K. K. (2010). Characterizing complexity of computer simulations and implications for student learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1289, 257–260. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3515215
Podolefsky, N. S., Perkins, K. K., & Adams, W. K. (2010). Factors promoting engaged exploration with computer simulations. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 6(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020117
Pranata, O. D. (2023a). Enhancing Conceptual Understanding and Concept Acquisition of Gravitational Force through Guided Inquiry Utilizing PhET Simulation. Saintek: Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi, 15(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.31958/js.v15i1.9191
Pranata, O. D. (2023b). Penerapan Game-Based Learning Sebagai Alternatif Solusi Mengajar di Kelas Heterogen. Jurnal Pengabdian Al-Ikhlas, 8(3), 337–350.
Pranata, O. D. (2023c). Penerapan Puzzle-Based Learning untuk Mengajar Matematika dan Sains di Pasantren dengan Kelas Heterogen. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat UNSIQ, 10(2), 109–115.
Pranata, O. D. (2023d). Physics Education Technology (PhET) as Confirmatory Tools in Learning Physics. Jurnal Riset Fisika Edukasi Dan Sains, 10(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.22202/jrfes.2023.v10i1.6815
Pranata, O. D., & Seprianto, S. (2023). Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Melalui Skema Blended learning Menggunakan Lembar Kerja Berbasis Simulasi. Karst : Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Terapannya, 6(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46918/karst.v6i1.1724
Putri, A. L., Pranata, O. D., & Sastria, E. (2024). Students Perception of Science and Technology in Science Learning: A Gender Comparative Study. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 19(1), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v19i1.6153
Putri, D. H., & Pranata, O. D. (2023). Eksplorasi Kejenuhan Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Sains Setelah Pandemi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains (JIPS), 4(2), 62–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37729/jips.v4i2.3367
Strand, K., Marullo, S., Cutforth, N., Stoecker, R., & Donohue, P. (2003). Community-Based Research and Higher Education. Jossey-Bass.
Utami, A. F., Pranata, O. D., & Angela, L. (2024). Analisis Tingkat Kejenuhan Siswa Sebelum , Selama , dan Setelah Pembelajaran Sains. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.8.1.1-9
Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., Loeblein, P., & Perkins, K. K. (2010). Teaching Physics Using PhET Simulations. The Physics Teacher, 48(4), 225–227. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3361987
Wieman, C. E., & Perkins, K. K. (2006). A powerful tool for teaching science. Nature Physics, 2(5), 290–292. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys283
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
