Pengaruh Knowledge Management, Skill dan Attitude Terhadap Employee Percformance (Studi Kasus Pada Satuan Kerja Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Wonosobo)
Knowledge Management, Skill, Attitude, Employee Performance
Abstract
Suatu lembaga di era pengetahuan saat ini semakin membutuhkan sumber daya manusia yang memiliki manajemen pengetahuan dengan tanggung jawab atau tugas yang dijalankan oleh pegawai berdasarkan Standard Operation Procedure (SOP) yang ada dan sifatnya formal. Selain membutuhkan sumber daya manusia yang memiliki manajemen pengetahuan, pegawai juga harus membutuhkan keterampilan, serta sikap dalam rangka menciptakan sumber daya manusia yang memiliki kinerja yang tinggi. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk pengaruh Personal Knowledge Job Procedure terhadap Employee Performance Technology Skill terhadap Employee Performance Attitude dan Untuk membuktikan pengaruh Personal Knowledge terhadap Employee Performance melalui variabel Job Procedure. Sampel penelitian ini adalah pegawai negeri sipil di lingkungan pemerintah daerah kabupaten wonosobo yang berjumlah 97. Teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah model persamaan struktural (Structural Equation Modeling – SEM) berbasis variance atau Component based SEM, yang terkenal disebut Partial Least Square (PLS).
Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Personal knowledge berpengaruh positif terhadap Employe performance (H1 diterima). Job procedure berpengaruh positif terhadap Employe performance (H2 diterima). Technology berpengaruh positif terhadap Employe performance diterima (H3 diterima). Skill berpengaruh positif terhadap Employe performance diterima (H4 diterima). Attitude berpengaruh positif terhadap Employe performance (H5 diterima). Personal knowledge berpengaruh positif terhadap Empoyee performance melalui Job procedure sebagai variabel intervening. (H6 diterima).
Downloads
References
Al-Ansari, Y., S. Pervan, dan J. Xu. 2013. Innovation and Business Performance of Smes: The Case of Dubai. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 6(3/4), 162-180.
Barney, J. 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
Carolina López-Nicolás, Á.L. Mero ̃no-Cerdán, 2011. Strategic knowledge management, innovation and performance, International Journal of Information Management. 31: 502– 509
Damanpour, F. 1991. Organizational Innovation : A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinats and Moderators. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34, No. 3
Damanpour, F., dan M. Schneider. 2009. Characteristics of Innovation and Innovation Adoption in Public Organizations: Assessing the Role of Managers. Journal of public administration research and theory, 19(3), 495-522.
Fornell, Claes dan F.L. Bookstein (1982). Two structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory. Journal of Marketing Research, XIX (November), 440-452
Geisser, Seymour 1975. The Predictive Sample Reuse Method with Applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70 (June), 320-328
Ghozali, I. 2008. Structural Equation Modeling: Alternative Method with Partial Least Square (Pls). Semarang, Indonesia.
Honeycutt, J. 2000. Knowledge Management Strategies : Mapping Your Organization's Success in Today's Competitive Marketplace : Little, Brown & Co. Inc
Kaplan, R. S., dan D. P. Norton. 1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action: Harvard Business Press.
López-Nicolás, C., dan Á.L. Meroño-Cerdán. 2011. Strategic Knowledge management, Innovation and Performance. International journal of information management, 31(6), 502-509.
Martins, E., dan F. Terblanche. 2003. Building Organisational Culture That Stimulates Creativity and Innovation. European Journal of innovation management, 6(1), 64-74.
Megantoro, R. G., M. Miyasto, dan M. Rahardjo. 2014. Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Organisasi Dengan Knowledge management Sebagai Variabel Mediating (Studi Empiris Pada Badan Pengawasan Keuangan Dan Pembangunan (Bpkp)). Diponegoro University.
Nielsen, P., P. Rasmussen, Y.-C. Hsiao, C.-J. Chen, dan S.-C. Chang. 2011. Knowledge management Capacity and Organizational Performance: The Social Interaction View. International Journal of Manpower, 32(5/6), 645-660.
Nonaka, I., dan H. Takeuchi. 1995. The Knowledge Creation Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press. New York, USA, 304.
Nothnagel, K. 2008. Empirical Research within Resource-Based Theory: A Meta-Analysis of the Central Propositions: Springer Science & Business Media.
Noviyanti, T., dan A. D. Mulyanto. 2015. Pengaruh Knowledge management Te Rhadap Inovasi, Implementasi Strategi Dan Kinerja Organisasi (Studi Pada Rs Lavalette Malang). Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis, 20(1).
Salaman, Graeme dan J. Storey. 2002. Manager's Theories About the Process of Innovation. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 39, Issue 2 March 2002.
Stone, M. 1974. Cross-Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 36 (2), 111-147
Uriarte A. Filemon, Introduction to Knowledge Management, ASEAN Foundation, 2008, Jakarta, Indonesia
Yeşil, S., dan A. Kaya. 2013. The Role of Organizational Culture on Innovation Capability: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Information Technology and Business Management, 6(1), 11-25.
Yeşil, S., A. Koska, dan T. Büyükbeşe. 2013. Knowledge Sharing Process, Innovation Capability and Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, 217-225.
Yousif Al-Hakim, L. A., dan S. Hassan. 2013. Knowledge management Strategies, Innovation, and Organisational Performance: An Empirical Study of the Iraqi Mts. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 10(1), 58-71.
Zehir, C., E. Altindag, dan A. Z. Acar. 2011. The Effects of Relationship Orientation through Innovation Orientation on Firm Performance: An Empirical Study on Turkish Family-Owned Firms. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 896-908.
Zheng, W., B. Yang, dan G. N. McLean. 2010. Linking Organizational Culture, Structure, Strategy, and Organizational Effectiveness: Mediating Role of Knowledge management. Journal of Business Research, 63(7), 763-771.
