POLITICAL MARRIAGE REFLECTED IN MIQUEL SAPOCHNIK’S HOUSE OF THE DRAGON (2022)

  • Irfin Najih Universitas Sains Alqur'an
  • Ana Widiyanti Universitas Sains Alqur'an
Keywords: Political Marriage, Patriarchal System, Sociology of Literature

Abstract

This descriptive qualitative research aims to examine how The House of Dragon Movie represent complex issues in political marriage practice. By using sociological theory and close textual analysis, this research examines how the movie presents political practice and how the effect of patriarchal system in political marriage over women’s life. The film is indeed portrayed the condition of people, especially the ones who belong to high classes or powerful society in confronting political marriage. The research finding shows that political marriage is a common practice in classical era, especially in royal or high classes family, to secure their belonging, status, or power. The others finding are: 1) political marriage is usually set since the children of royal family or high classes society are still child; 2) patriarchal system often become the most influence to make political marriage practice happen; 3) political marriage under the effect of patriarchal system brings hardship for women in many aspects of life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Creswell, W. John. (2014). Research Design. London. Sage.
Durkheim, Émile. (1982). The Rules of Sociological Method. Free Press.
Denzin, N. K. (1995). The cinematic society: The voyeur's gaze. SAGE Publications.
Etherington-Wright, C., & Doughty, R. (2017). Understanding Film Theory (2nd ed). Palgrave Macmillan.
Geary, David C. (2010). Male, Female: The Evolution of Human Sex Differences. American Psychological Association.
Gillis, John R. (1985). For Better, For Worse: British Marriages, 1600 to the Present. Oxford University Press.
Gilligan, C., & Snider, N. (2018). Why Does Patriarchy Persist? Cambridge, UK; Medford, MA: Polity Press.
Goody, Jack. The Development of the Family and Marriage in Europe. Cambridge University Press, 1983.
Hartmann, Heidi. The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union. Capital & Class, 1979.
Lerner, Gerda. The Creation of Patriarchy. Oxford University Press, 1986.
Meltem, Temizkan. (2022). The Power Wars of Cleopatras of Ptolemaic Origin, Who Attended the Seleucid Kondom Through Marriage. International Journal of Ancient History, 4/2. Doi: 10.33469/Oannes.1054958
Millett, Kate. (1970). Sexual Politics. Doubleday.
Moore, Leah Elisabeth. (2022). The Past and Present: Issues of Male Patriarchy Throughout Historic Literature and Dominance in Media Today. East Tennessee State University. Accessed on December 27, 2023 at 03.19 p.m.
Muhammed, J.A., & Jacob, F. (2021). Marriage Discourse: Historical and Literary Perspective on Gender Inequality and Patriarchic Exploitation. Walter de Gruyter GmbH. Berlin/Boston.

Pokhrel, S., (2022). Capitalism and Marriage Practice: A Case Study of Pokhara Metropolitan City. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 11 (December).

Singh, S. (2019). The Politics of Marriage in Medieval India: Gender and Alliance in Rajasthan. Oxford University Press.
Sutherland, J.‑A., & Feltey, K. M. (Eds.). (2013). Cinematic sociology: Social life in film (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Walby, S. (1989). Theorizing Patriarchy. Basil Blackwell.
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization (A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
Westermarck, E. (1921). The History of Human Marriage (Vol.2). Macmillan.
Wellek, R., & Warren, A. (2014). Teori Kesusastraan (hlm.3). Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Published
2025-05-30
How to Cite
Najih, I., & Widiyanti, A. (2025, May 30). POLITICAL MARRIAGE REFLECTED IN MIQUEL SAPOCHNIK’S HOUSE OF THE DRAGON (2022). CLLiENT (Culture, Literature, Linguistics, and English Teaching), 7(1), 19-33. Retrieved from https://ojs.unsiq.ac.id/index.php/cllient/article/view/10022