Implementatio of The Innovation Learning Development Design Model from Jerrold E. Kemp, Gary R. Morrison, And Steven M. Ross: Literature Review and Current Implementation

Authors

  • Dunia Purnama Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Mataram, Indonesia
  • Rina Martiana Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Mataram, Indonesia
  • Satutik Rahayu Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Mataram, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32699/cathasaintifica.v3i2.9450

Keywords:

Kemp.Morrison.Ross model, Instructional Design, Differentiated instruction, digital technologies

Abstract

This article reviews the instructional design model developed by Jerrold E. Kemp, Gary R. Morrison, and Steven M. Ross, focusing on its structure, characteristics, and implementation in contemporary educational contexts. The study uses a systematic literature review approach to evaluate how the model responds to the demands of modern education, including the learner-centered philosophy, differentiated instruction, and the integration of digital technologies. The Kemp-Morrison-Ross model features nine interdependent components that can be accessed non-linearly, offering high flexibility and adaptability for instructional planning. The findings indicate that this model aligns well with current curriculum reforms such as Indonesia's Merdeka Curriculum, supporting personalized and project-based learning approaches. Although conceptually robust, challenges exist in practical implementation, such as limited teacher capacity, lack of systemic support, and uneven access to instructional technology. The discussion suggests that this model can serve as a framework for transformative instructional design when supported by adequate training, policy, and digital infrastructure. The article concludes by highlighting the model's potential in guiding instructional innovation and calls for further empirical research to evaluate its effectiveness in diverse learning environments.

References

Agustan, S. (2019). Designing the development of Kemp model learning tools on the topic of flat-sided geometric shapes for class VIII SMP. In National Seminar on Education 2015 (pp. 195–203).

Ainun, FP, Mawarni, HS, Sakinah, L., Lestari, NA, & Purna, TH (2022). Identification of digital transformation in the world of education regarding opportunities and challenges in the era of disruption. Journal of Citizenship, 6 (1), 1570-1580.

Akbulut, Y. (2007). Implications of two well-known models for instructional designers in distance education: Dick-Carey versus Morrison-Ross-Kemp. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 8 (2), 62–68.

Bajracharya, J.R. (2019). Instructional design and models: ASSURE and Kemp. Journal of Education and Research, 9 (2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3126/jer.v9i2.30455

Defina, D. (2018). Research and development model for BIPA (Indonesian for Foreign Speakers) teaching materials. Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 4 (1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.24235/ileal.v4i1.3070

Hastutie, G., & Ramli, M. (2024). Learning Design (Dick & Carey Model, Jerold E. Kemp, et al.). An-Nashr: Scientific Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 2 (1), 41-51.

Kemp, J. E., Morrison, G. R., & Ross, S. M. (1994). Designing effective instruction (2nd ed.). Merrill.

Kosassy, SO (2019). Reviewing learning development models and learning tools. Pelita Bangsa Pelestari Pancasila, 14 (1), 11–21.

Limapornvanitr, T. (2024). Book review: Designing effective instruction, 2013 by Gary R. Morrison, Steven M. Ross, Howard K. Kalman, and Jerald E. Kemp. International Journal of Industrial Education and Technology, 6 (1), B1–B4.

Magdalena, I., Septiarini, AA, & Nurhaliza, S. (2020). Application of learning design models at State Islamic Senior High School 12, West Jakarta. PENSA: Journal of Science Education, 2 (2), 241–265. https://doi.org/10.25037/pensa.v2i2.345

Mugara, R., & Ali, EY (2025). Curriculum and Learning in Elementary Education: Theory, Design, Strategy, and Contextual Implementation for the 21st Century. Widina Publisher.

Rusmayana, T. (2021). The ADDIE learning model integrating PEdATI at SMK PGRI Karisma Bangsa as a substitute for field work practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Indonesian Journal of Vocational Education, 1 (1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.25041/jpvi.v1i1.1035

Sewu, MM, Dhiu, KD, & Maku, KRM (2021). Development of learning objectives for social emotional aspects based on the Morrison Ross and Kemp learning model in the 2013 Early Childhood Education Curriculum for Groups A and B at Citra Bakti Integrated Early Childhood Education. Jurnal Citra Pendidikan, 1 (2), 238–247.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Sujarwo, S., Samsi, I., & Wibawa, L. (2017). Design of a learning tour model at Gembira Loka Zoo Yogyakarta as an off-campus laboratory. Journal of Education and Community Empowerment, 4 (1), 90–101.

Yusuf, M., Julianingsih, D., & Ramadhani, T. (2023). Transformation of digital education 5.0 through the integration of scientific and technological innovation. MENTARI Journal: Management, Education and Information Technology, 2 (1), 11-19.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Implementatio of The Innovation Learning Development Design Model from Jerrold E. Kemp, Gary R. Morrison, And Steven M. Ross: Literature Review and Current Implementation. (2025). CATHA SAINTIFICA, 3(2), 109-114. https://doi.org/10.32699/cathasaintifica.v3i2.9450