PONDOK ‘S WORDS TRACE IN THE WRITING OF UNSIQ STUDENTS
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study is to explain the interference of the pondok’s words in the composition written by the first semester students of English department of UNSIQ Wonosobo. There are ten students who can fulfil the required criteria to be the subjects of research. The reason for choosing them is because they have not received extensive writing material. This research is a descriptive qualitative research. Data are collected by observing the compositions made by students. Data are analyzed using comparative analysis. The research findings are that all students studied still used pondok’s words their English compositions.
Keywords: pondok, interference, mother tongue
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Bibliography
Bhela, B. (1999). Native Language Interference in Learning a Second Language: Exploratory Case of Native Language Interference with Target Language Usage.International Education Journal, 1 (1999), 22-31.
Blum-Kulka, S. & Levenston, E. A. (1983). Universals of lexical simplifications. In strategies in Interlanguage Communication, eds. C.Faerch and G. Kasper.London: Longman.
Brown, H.D. (1994).Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. NJ: Prentice Hall
Elkilic & Aydin (2009). Difficulty of Turky EFL in Pronuncing Certain English Sound Due to the Lack of the Sound in Turky Language. The First Istambul International ELT Conference, 29-30 May 2009, 25-30
Elkilic, Gencer. (2012) Mother tongue traces of Turkish university students on composition papers written in English. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 47 ( 2012 ) 656 – 664.
Mahmoud, A. (2000) 'Modern Standard Arabic vs. Non-Standard Arabic: Where Do Arab Students of EFL Transfer From?', Language, Culture. and Curriculum, 13: 2, 126 -136.
Gass, S.M. and Selinker, L.(2001). Second Laguage Acquisition: An Introductory Course. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Goldstein, LLarry. For Kyla: What does the research say about responding to ESL writers. In T. Silva and P. Matsuda (Eds.), On
second language writing (pp.73-90). Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Maniam, Mahendra.(2016) Mother Tongue Syntactical Influence in a ESL Class. International Journal of Language and Linguistics: Vol. 3, No. 3; August 2016.
Bhela, B. (1999). Native Language Interference in Learning a Second Language: Exploratory Case of Native Language Interference with Target Language Usage.International Education Journal, 1 (1999), 22-31.
Blum-Kulka, S. & Levenston, E. A. (1983). Universals of lexical simplifications. In strategies in Interlanguage Communication, eds. C.Faerch and G. Kasper.London: Longman.
Brown, H.D. (1994).Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. NJ: Prentice Hall
Elkilic & Aydin (2009). Difficulty of Turky EFL in Pronuncing Certain English Sound Due to the Lack of the Sound in Turky Language. The First Istambul International ELT Conference, 29-30 May 2009, 25-30
Elkilic, Gencer. (2012) Mother tongue traces of Turkish university students on composition papers written in English. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 47 ( 2012 ) 656 – 664.
Mahmoud, A. (2000) 'Modern Standard Arabic vs. Non-Standard Arabic: Where Do Arab Students of EFL Transfer From?', Language, Culture. and Curriculum, 13: 2, 126 -136.
Gass, S.M. and Selinker, L.(2001). Second Laguage Acquisition: An Introductory Course. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Goldstein, LLarry. For Kyla: What does the research say about responding to ESL writers. In T. Silva and P. Matsuda (Eds.), On
second language writing (pp.73-90). Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Maniam, Mahendra.(2016) Mother Tongue Syntactical Influence in a ESL Class. International Journal of Language and Linguistics: Vol. 3, No. 3; August 2016.
Published
2019-11-30
How to Cite
laksono puji. (2019, November 30). PONDOK ‘S WORDS TRACE IN THE WRITING OF UNSIQ STUDENTS. CLLiENT (Culture, Literature, Linguistics, and English Teaching), 1(02), 177-189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32699/cllient.v1i02.894
Section
Articles
